Martin Michlmayr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > * Michael Banck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-03-24 00:58]: >> > s/crates/creates/ >> > s/debootstrap/cdebootstrap/ >> >> Is there any good reason we don't use the official debootstrap? > > Yeah, I think I later tried to ask rleigh on irc but he wasn't around. > > I think all reasons for cdebootstrap went away when debootstrap got > dependency handling. d-i uses debootstrap and has no plans to move, > so it woud be great if sbuild did too.
I used cdebootstrap after some IRC discussion on #d-d about which was
most up-to-date and maintained, and the general concensus was that
cdebootstrap was the way to go.
If this is incorrect, I'll revert back to debootstrap.
Regards,
Roger
--
Roger Leigh
Printing on GNU/Linux? http://gutenprint.sourceforge.net/
Debian GNU/Linux http://www.debian.org/
GPG Public Key: 0x25BFB848. Please sign and encrypt your mail.
pgpybaYed4TTn.pgp
Description: PGP signature
