Hi again, On 19-07-30 21:39:00, Chris Lamb wrote: > I'm not going to implement this bit just yet until I solve the more > deeper problem of it, well, not actually caching anything at the > moment. See previous messages for more background.
As far as I can tell, the cache problem was caused by a breaking upstream change. This got fixed [1]. Probably, didn't test, this "should work" again. Cheers, Georg [1] https://salsa.debian.org/salsa/salsa-ansible/commit/c6404e6b31267a8f9c46a2eb7838b829e08a451d
