Hello, On Sun 14 Jul 2019 at 03:03PM -07, Russ Allbery wrote:
> In that case, should we increase the strength of this by changing the > first sentence? I'm not seeing much purpose served by developer > discretion here, and this clarifies matters for tool developers. > > diff --git a/policy/ch-controlfields.rst b/policy/ch-controlfields.rst > index 81b3542..8124d64 100644 > --- a/policy/ch-controlfields.rst > +++ b/policy/ch-controlfields.rst > @@ -979,7 +979,10 @@ repository where the Debian source package is developed. > or ``hg clone`` command. If no branch is specified, the packaging > should be on the default branch. > > - More than one different VCS may be specified for the same package. > + A package control file must not have more than one ``Vcs-<type>`` > + field. If the package is maintained in multple version control > + systems, the maintainer should specify the one that they would prefer > + other people to use as the basis for proposing changes to the package. > > For both fields, any URLs given should use a scheme that provides > confidentiality (``https``, for example, rather than ``http`` or ``git``) Seconded. Thanks, Guillem, for the research! -- Sean Whitton
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
