On Wed, Jul 03, 2019 at 08:00:27PM +0300, Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov wrote: > ср, 3 июл. 2019 г. в 18:52, Adam Borowski <kilob...@angband.pl>: > > It's a pity neither Guo nor you managed to update the docs before Buster, > > but 1. we can upload this to buster-backports soon, > > Should I do anything manually to do this upload?
There's nothing we can do before this package passes NEW and migrates to testing. > > and 2. there's a nice > > fresh Bullseye open for uploads within the migration delay. > > For now they are waiting in NEW. Right. > > It'd be great if you could do gcc-9-doc as well. > > Sure, I'll take a look within a month (or if gcc-9 is uploaded to unstable). Heh, I'm way too eager here -- I believed gcc-9 is long since in unstable, merely not in buster. > For now my priority would be to push updated gcc-doc-defaults to unstable > (packages are ready, you can check them on mentors.debian.net). Right; let's wait for ftpfolks. Meow! -- ⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀ ⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ Packager's rule #1: upstream _always_ screws something up. This ⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀ is true especially if you're packaging your own project. ⠈⠳⣄⠀⠀⠀⠀
