Hi Andreas,

> > Please see https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1718212
> > 
> > Patch is at https://gist.github.com/dhondta/f71ae7e5c4234f8edfd2f12503a5dcc7
> 
> I know you are usually pretty quick in solving serious issues.  I tried
> to check the issue and think the link provided for a patch is just
> pointing to a proof of concept exploit.  When reading the discussion
> here
> 
>    https://github.com/davidhalter/parso/issues/75
> 
> I understand that it is not fixed but the authors do not consider the
> issue serious.  Could you please give some comment from an insiders
> point of view (which I'm not).  I'm just caring since several Debian
> Science dependencies are about to be removed from testing due to this
> bug.

I don't consider it that serious as well. I'll wait for upstream to
provide a proper fix. If there will be no such fix in time, I guess I can
just disable cache if security team insists.

> PS: Is there any reason why this package is not on Salsa and not
>     team maintained?

that's because python-jedi is a mutli-tarball source package and parso
was part of it at the beginning. Last time I checked gbp didn't
support it (or I don't know how to use it) so it was easier for me to
keep it outside DPMT. I guess there's no reason not to move parso into
DPMT now.

Reply via email to