On Wed, 2019-05-29 at 12:25 +0200, Andreas Beckmann wrote: > On 2019-05-28 09:40, Stefan Tsanev wrote: > > I agree with Ghis, maybe a little more information before this > > update > > could be in great use here. Some people with bumblebee and enabled > > multiarch may find difficulties understanding why their system > > doesn't > > want to continue updating anymore via apt. I sitll feel odd about > > this > > upgrade and I'm glad, that I'm not the only one. > > In most cases you would not care about the removed support for i386. > You > would care about removed support for your GPU - you will get notified > about this (news (always) and debconf (if legacy hardware present) > and > that you need to switch to the legacy driver. > amd64 + foreign arch i386 is not (yet) part of our test matrix ... > > Could someone please define the minimal set of packages to be > installed > for a working optimus setup, as there is probably no metapackage > covering that. I.e. something that I can run in a minimal chroot to > test > upgrades afterwards. I need this for both stretch and buster. (And an > upgrade from stretch usually should result in the buster set being > installed.) > > e.g. > > stretch# apt-get install --install-recommends bumblebee-nvidia > > > Thanks > > Andreas
Hi, this should be the list: bbswitch bumblebee bumblebee-nvidia primus primus-libs primus-libs-ia32 nvidia-driver-libs-nonglvnd nvidia-driver-libs-nonglvnd-i386 -- Kind regards, Luca Boccassi
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
