It would be nice if better ctop from https://ctop.sh would be packaged in Debian. Why Debian maintainers still keep old, unmaintained ctop package instead swtiching to better and active maintained implementation?
From: Antoine Beaupre <anar...@debian.org> Subject: unmaintained upstream, switch to other implementation There are two "ctop" packages out there, this one, packaged in Debian: https://github.com/yadutaf/ctop/ ... and "ctop.sh", not yet packaged in Debian but occupying a similar namespace: https://ctop.sh/https://github.com/bcicen/ctop >From what I understand, the latter is better maintained and less confusig. The last commit on yadutaf's program date from 2017 and there hasn't been an update of the Debian package since stretch, so I wonder if we really want to ship it with buster or maybe replace it with ctop.sh. -- IT paslaugos įmonėms, prekyba kompiuteriais su Linux OS: UAB „Bona Mens“ - http://bonamens.lt http://tinklas.eu/prekyba Tel.: +370-614-53085 Laisva programinė įranga verslui ir namams:http://baltix.lthttp://openoffice.lt