On 2006-03-21T23:16-0700 Bob Proulx wrote: > I think a fair paraphrase of the discussion was that instead of trying > to make the problematic iso-8601 work the decision was to switch to > rfc-3339 which was cleaner and avoided the worst of the problems. > > The upstream discussion actually spanned several months. Here are the > pointers to the lead message in each of the months in the archive. > > http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-coreutils/2005-05/msg00098.html > http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-coreutils/2005-07/msg00183.html > http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-coreutils/2005-09/msg00056.html
Thanks you for taking the time to answer me. Very interesting! The optional 'T' seemed to throw a spanner into the works. You can close this bug as far as I'm concerned. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
