On Wed, 2019-04-03 at 13:00 +0100, Simon McVittie wrote: > On Fri, 29 Mar 2019 at 20:13:17 +0100, Moritz Mühlenhoff wrote: > > On Mon, Mar 11, 2019 at 09:32:02PM +0100, Salvatore Bonaccorso > > wrote: > > > Version: 2.58.3-1 > > Do we know for sure that 2.58.x is vulnerable? I've tried the > reproducer > from the upstream bug and didn't see criticals or a crash. > > > > Forwarded: https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/glib/issues/1649 > > This bug says "Another likely regression from Happy Eyeballs". GLib's > implementation of RFC 8305 "Happy Eyeballs" is a new feature (or new > optimization, depending how you look at it) in 2.59.x/2.60.x.
Yeah, this bug should be present in 2.59.x where (x < 2). It was fixed by commit d553d92d6e9f53cbe5a34166fcb919ba652c6a8e, which is present in 2.59.2 onwards. The bug was not present in 2.58.x. I’ve left a comment about it here: https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/glib/issues/1649#note_481826 Philip
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
