Hi, I opened this bugreport specifically because there was no response from upstream regarding acceptance or denial for a long time, and because I think this patch is a security relevant enhancement.
I would be happy to see my patches in Upstream but for now I would love
to see it applied to debian, It is one patchfile and as soon as the
patch gots applied (if it ever gots applied) that patch file can be
removed from /debian.
I am not sure when and if that patch will ever applied to upstream at
the moment!
Thats a damn 230 line patch half of it is documentation, and due to
patch i guess about 30 to 40 lines of code. How hard can it be to ask
at least upstream to speed up the appliance process?
regards
Hans
On Tue, 2019-02-12 at 09:06 +0000, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
> This is an automatic notification regarding your Bug report
> which was filed against the libpam-modules package:
>
> #885940e: libpam-modules: add cmd_onerr=/sbin/powerdown and
> user_acces to pam tally2
>
> It has been closed by Steve Langasek <[email protected]>.
>
> Their explanation is attached below along with your original report.
> If this explanation is unsatisfactory and you have not received a
> better one in a separate message then please contact Steve Langasek <
> [email protected]> by
> replying to this email.
>
>
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
