reassign 354206 libmhash-dev 0.9.4a-1
thanks
I think this is actually a bug in libmhash-dev as it should be possible
to print the name (as far as I know). I personally do not understand what
the difference between uint8_t and unsigned char is but obviously it is...
Regards,
// Ola
----- Forwarded message from Daniel Schepler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -----
Envelope-to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Delivery-date: Thu, 02 Mar 2006 14:52:31 +0100
Subject: Bug#354206: steghide: FTBFS: invalid conversion
Reply-To: Daniel Schepler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Resent-From: Daniel Schepler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Resent-To: [email protected]
Resent-CC: Ola Lundqvist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Resent-Date: Thu, 02 Mar 2006 13:48:04 UTC
Resent-Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Debian-PR-Message: report 354206
X-Debian-PR-Package: steghide
X-Debian-PR-Keywords: moreinfo unreproducible
From: Daniel Schepler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
Resent-Sender: Debian BTS <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Resent-Date: Thu, 02 Mar 2006 05:48:04 -0800
X-Spam-Score: -1.7 (-)
X-Spamcheck-provider: Checked for spam by opalsys.net, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Le Samedi 25 Février 2006 17:33, Ola Lundqvist a écrit :
> tags 354206 + unreproducible moreinfo
> severity 354206 important
> thanks
>
> Hello
>
> On Fri, Feb 24, 2006 at 10:43:50AM +0100, Daniel Schepler wrote:
> > Package: steghide
> > Version: 0.5.1-7
> > Severity: serious
>
> I can not reproduce this problem (on latest etch). For what architecture do
> you build it and with what versions of relevant software?
>
> As I could not reproduce the problem I lowered the severity to important
> until you have given me more information so it is possible to reproduce.
>
> I compiler should not have a problem to convert between
> 'uint8_t*' and 'char*' unless there is a serious problem with them.
I just tried again with a freshly updated pbuilder (unstable) i386 chroot and
got the same error again. The version of g++-4.0 there is 4.0.2-9, and the
version of libmhash-dev is 0.9.4a-1.
It looks like it's complaining about assigning the result of
mhash_get_hash_name, which is of type mutils_word8*, to a char* variable,
which would involve an implicit conversion. So it's validly complaining
about invalid C++ code. Of course, if mhash_get_hash_name is actually
supposed to return a user-readable string, it's probably a bug in mhash to
return the result as a uint8_t* instead of a char*.
--
Daniel Schepler
----- End forwarded message -----
--
--------------------- Ola Lundqvist ---------------------------
/ [EMAIL PROTECTED] Annebergsslingan 37 \
| [EMAIL PROTECTED] 654 65 KARLSTAD |
| +46 (0)54-10 14 30 +46 (0)70-332 1551 |
| http://www.opal.dhs.org UIN/icq: 4912500 |
\ gpg/f.p.: 7090 A92B 18FE 7994 0C36 4FE4 18A1 B1CF 0FE5 3DD9 /
---------------------------------------------------------------
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
