reopen 356152
retitle Messages being falsely identified as spam
thanks

On Fri, Mar 17, 2006 at 06:04:22AM -0800, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
> >My messages to d-legal aren't being delivered, and I havn't seen any bounces.
> 
> they have been identified as spam.

This is a bug, since they are clearly not spam.  Please don't close this
ticket when it's not fixed.

> >It looks related to the fact that I'm posting from a different address
> >than I'm subscribed--"[EMAIL PROTECTED]" vs "[EMAIL PROTECTED]", and I'll
> >work around it on my end by not doing that.  But silently discarding
> >messages, from a configuration that's worked fine for ages, is bad.
> >I hadn't noticed for quite a while, since it's messages from other
> >people that I look for on lists; I tune out my own.
> 
> i suggest that you add all your posting addresses to out
> pseudolist 'whitelist', so you won't get penalized for not being
> subscribed to a list.

The lists have been dropping my mail, with no indication that it was
happening.  This is a recent development, as I had been posting in this
manner for quite a long time.  Mailing lists are the backbone of Debian
communication; the lists dropping legitimate messages (especially without
notification) is an extremely serious problem.

> Your Spamassassinscore for all 9 messages i found is 4.6, which sums
> up from
> 
>  4.4 HELO_DYNAMIC_IPADDR
>  2.0 RCVD_IN_SORBS_DUL

These rules are incorrect.  It's ordinary and valid to send mail directly
from a "dynamic" IP address, and unacceptable to demand that people use a
third-party relay, reducing the reliability of their mail by introducing
extra points of failure.  My IP address hasn't changed in over a year, and
this demand is an attempt to make my server a second-class citizen due to
overgeneralization.

-- 
Glenn Maynard

Reply via email to