On Fri, Apr 08, 2016 at 03:48:20PM -0700, Andy Valencia wrote: > Package: lynx > Version: 2.8.9dev1-2+deb8u1 > Severity: normal > > RFC 6265 cleared up some older ambiguities with respect to different > ports on the same web server host. Specifically:
yes but - perhaps some additional clarification is needed. Reading the code, the only place where Lynx appears to be paying attention to the port for cookies is from an RFC-2965 implementation which provides a "Port" attribute. An RFC 6265-compliant implementation wouldn't send that. (In 2.9.0dev.1, Lynx will ignore the Port attribute when in RFC-6265 mode). -- Thomas E. Dickey <dic...@invisible-island.net> https://invisible-island.net ftp://ftp.invisible-island.net
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
