Hi Thorsten, On Wed, Jan 02, 2019 at 05:39:39PM +0100, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote: > Hi Thorsten, > > On Wed, Jan 02, 2019 at 04:08:23PM +0000, Thorsten Glaser wrote: > > Package: src:linux > > Version: 4.19.13-1 > > Severity: normal > > > > I???ve just rebooted this VM and get: > > > > root@ci-busyapps:~ # uptime > > 16:06:57 up 58 days, 21:22, 1 user, load average: 0.62, 0.98, 0.46 > > > > In syslog, I see this: > > > > Jan 2 15:55:01 ci-busyapps CRON[3287]: (root) CMD (command -v debian-sa1 > > > /dev/null && debian-sa1 1 1) > > Jan 2 15:56:11 ci-busyapps postfix/anvil[3005]: statistics: max connection > > rate 1/60s for (smtp:172.26.1.40) at Jan 2 15:52:51 > > Jan 2 15:56:11 ci-busyapps postfix/anvil[3005]: statistics: max connection > > count 1 for (smtp:172.26.1.40) at Jan 2 15:52:51 > > Jan 2 15:56:11 ci-busyapps postfix/anvil[3005]: statistics: max cache size > > 1 at Jan 2 15:52:51 > > Jan 2 15:57:20 ci-busyapps sensord: sensord stopped > > Jan 2 15:58:05 ci-busyapps dhclient[1031]: DHCPREQUEST of 172.26.1.40 on > > eth0 to 172.26.100.2 port 67 > > Jan 2 15:58:05 ci-busyapps dhclient[1031]: DHCPACK of 172.26.1.40 from > > 172.26.100.2 > > Jan 2 15:58:05 ci-busyapps dhclient[1031]: bound to 172.26.1.40 -- renewal > > in 19447 seconds. > > Jan 2 15:59:04 ci-busyapps shutdown[7314]: shutting down for system reboot > > Jan 2 15:59:05 ci-busyapps init: Switching to runlevel: 6 > > Jan 2 15:59:09 ci-busyapps jenkins: jenkins: client (pid 1579) exited with > > 143 status > > Jan 2 15:59:10 ci-busyapps ntpd[1608]: ntp engine exiting > > Jan 2 15:59:10 ci-busyapps ntpd[1607]: Terminating > > Jan 2 15:59:10 ci-busyapps postfix/master[22032]: terminating on signal 15 > > Jan 2 15:59:18 ci-busyapps syslogd: exiting on signal 15 > > Jan 2 16:00:47 ci-busyapps syslogd (GNU inetutils 1.9.4): restart > > Jan 2 16:00:47 ci-busyapps vmunix: [ 0.000000] Linux version > > 4.19.0-1-amd64 (debian-ker...@lists.debian.org) (gcc version 8.2.0 (Debian > > 8.2.0-13)) #1 SMP Debian 4.19.13-1 (2018-12-30) > > Jan 2 16:00:47 ci-busyapps vmunix: [ 0.000000] Command line: > > BOOT_IMAGE=/boot/vmlinuz-4.19.0-1-amd64 > > root=/dev/mapper/vg--ci--busyapps-lv--root ro net.ifnames=0 kaslr nomodeset > > Jan 2 16:00:47 ci-busyapps vmunix: [ 0.000000] x86/fpu: x87 FPU will > > use FXSAVE > > Jan 2 16:00:47 ci-busyapps vmunix: [ 0.000000] BIOS-provided physical > > RAM map: > > Jan 2 16:00:47 ci-busyapps vmunix: [ 0.000000] BIOS-e820: [mem > > 0x0000000000000000-0x000000000009fbff] usable > > Jan 2 16:00:47 ci-busyapps vmunix: [ 0.000000] BIOS-e820: [mem > > 0x000000000009fc00-0x000000000009ffff] reserved > > Jan 2 16:00:47 ci-busyapps vmunix: [ 0.000000] BIOS-e820: [mem > > 0x00000000000f0000-0x00000000000fffff] reserved > > Jan 2 16:00:47 ci-busyapps vmunix: [ 0.000000] BIOS-e820: [mem > > 0x0000000000100000-0x00000000dfffdfff] usable > > Jan 2 16:00:47 ci-busyapps vmunix: [ 0.000000] BIOS-e820: [mem > > 0x00000000dfffe000-0x00000000dfffffff] reserved > > Jan 2 16:00:47 ci-busyapps vmunix: [ 0.000000] BIOS-e820: [mem > > 0x00000000feffc000-0x00000000feffffff] reserved > > Jan 2 16:00:47 ci-busyapps vmunix: [ 0.000000] BIOS-e820: [mem > > 0x00000000fffc0000-0x00000000ffffffff] reserved > > Jan 2 16:00:47 ci-busyapps vmunix: [ 0.000000] BIOS-e820: [mem > > 0x0000000100000000-0x000000021fffffff] usable > > Jan 2 16:00:47 ci-busyapps vmunix: [ 0.000000] NX (Execute Disable) > > protection: active > > Jan 2 16:00:47 ci-busyapps vmunix: [ 0.000000] SMBIOS 2.4 present. > > Jan 2 16:00:47 ci-busyapps vmunix: [ 0.000000] DMI: Bochs Bochs, BIOS > > Bochs 01/01/2011 > > Jan 2 16:00:47 ci-busyapps vmunix: [ 0.000000] Hypervisor detected: KVM > > Jan 2 16:00:47 ci-busyapps vmunix: [ 0.000000] kvm-clock: Using msrs > > 4b564d01 and 4b564d00 > > Jan 2 16:00:47 ci-busyapps vmunix: [5087690.332663] kvm-clock: cpu 0, msr > > 3ffd7001, primary cpu clock > > Jan 2 16:00:47 ci-busyapps vmunix: [5087690.332663] clocksource: > > kvm-clock: mask: 0xffffffffffffffff max_cycles: 0x1cd42e4dffb, max_idle_ns: > > 881590591483 ns > > Jan 2 16:00:47 ci-busyapps vmunix: [5087690.332665] tsc: Detected 3064.488 > > MHz processor > > As a datapoint: This sounds familiar in the sense that it was reported > earlier https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20181106054212.GA31768@nautica/ .
There was now a followup on this, and if you can I think it's best if you can followup there. https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/ca+ck2bc70pnl0wimb0xt99j4nnfi8w3zuuhgak-jspuop9j...@mail.gmail.com/ Regards, Salvatore p.s.: my earlier reply to you seem to have been rejected and never reached you, hope this one does now.
