On 1/3/19 11:46 PM, Hans van Kranenburg wrote: > Hi, > > On 11/6/18 10:30 PM, Sebastian Piecha wrote: >> The patch file has a little bug as I commented out the else branch in >> the last if section. Now it works again... >> >> [...] > > I think we should move this discussion to (or extend to) upstream Xen > development. If you want, please do so by starting a topic on the > xen-users mailing list, summarize things a bit and refer to the url of > the Debian bug. > > [...]
Ahem, I see that already happened, and that is how the story started. :) So, taking it to the next level... Getting this forward is more likely to happen with a proposed working alternative implementation as patch-set to the xen-devel list. There seems not to be much interest in this by default, and only complaining that things don't work often doesn't improve that situation. I still think proper anti-spoofing behaviour out of the box would be a really nice thing. But, as we've seen already, it's not trivial because the dom0 needs to have all kinds of information about what's happening inside the domU it starts. Hans
