[2019-01-02 18:43] Paride Legovini <p...@ninthfloor.org> > Dmitry Bogatov wrote on 28/12/2018: > > It seems, that using st-256color TERM name for st=0.8 is incorrect. > > > > I am no terminfo expert, but seems last update broke my dvtm setup. > > st=0.8-1 with TERM=st-256color looks bad, while with TERM=st-0.7 looks > > okay. > > Hello Dmitry, sorry for the late reply, I was on vacation. > > TERM=st-256color is what upstream uses by default. I can reproduce the > issue you describe with dvtm 0.15-5 and stterm 0.8.1-1 but also with > xterm with TERM=xterm-256color, so I am prone to think that the problem > is with dvtm.
Sorry, can not reproduce bug with xterm. > Since dvtm 0.15 has been released I see that a few color handling > patches were merged, and indeed I can't reproduce the issue with the > latest git version. Could you please give it a try? Confirmed. Git HEAD (g311a8c0) works fine. I will upload this version of dvtm.
