Le jeudi 20 décembre 2018 à 16:15 -0800, Mike Miller a écrit : > On Thu, Dec 20, 2018 at 15:37:55 -0800, Mike Miller wrote: > > something (possibly mesa) was messed up in the archive and resulted in a > > bad build. A binNMU should be sufficient to fix this, but a new source > > upload may be coming soon anyway. > > Aside to Debian Octave maintainers - should debian/rules error out if > something like this happens again? Add/patch anything to turn upstream > optional features mandatory? Patch warnings into errors, or grep > config.log for certain warnings? Or is that overkill?
I think it would make sense to add an autopkgtest for that specific issue, to detect it should it appear again. The only drawback with respect to putting it as a failure in debian/rules is that autopkgtest are only routinely exercised on amd64. -- ⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀ Sébastien Villemot ⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ Debian Developer ⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀ http://sebastien.villemot.name ⠈⠳⣄⠀⠀⠀⠀ http://www.debian.org
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
