Hi Ricardo, On 11/8/18 3:40 PM, Ricardo Fraile wrote: > But in any case, the time counted is not the "running time", the term > "wall clock" or "elapsed real time" is more correct instead of the > actual definition, I will fix it.
Wouldn't be also possible to sample the "wall clock" at a given
frequency (say e.g. 2 or 3Hz) to be able to see a "jump" on that measure
("wall clock)? Wouldn't that detect a suspend or hivernate event?
Thanks,
--xiscu
