[Rafal Jan Czlonka] > I've just read the description of bug #324599, but the one I've found > is quite opposite - checkbashisms fails to recognise functions where > the word "function" is omitted, like first() or second ().
What's the problem? "foo() { bar; }" is not a bashism. All POSIX
shells support that. It is the "function" keyword that is a bashism.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
