Junichi Uekawa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
>> *****************************************************************************
>> * A replica of Antykwa P\'o\l{}tawskiego font *
>> * in PostScript Type 1 format -- preliminary version *
>> * Public domain *
>> *****************************************************************************
>>
>> Since Public Domain isn't a well defined term at least in some laws,
>> probably including the polish, this should be made more specific, like
>>
>> "Permission is granted to freely use, distribute and/or modify all files
>> in the bundle."
>
> If you start acting against 'public domain',
I'm not.
> there are many things in
> Debian that will have to be modified. Are you sure?
AFAIK, debian-legal's majority's opinion has always been that the
license should be explained in a sentence.
Regards, Frank
--
Frank Küster
Single Molecule Spectroscopy, Protein Folding @ Inst. f. Biochemie, Univ. Zürich
Debian Developer (teTeX)
