Hi Raphael, On Fri, 21 Sep 2018 14:16:15 +0200, Raphael Hertzog <[email protected]> wrote: > Hello Frédéric, > > On Thu, 20 Sep 2018, Frédéric Bonnard wrote: > > This was version in 5.11.0-2. But in both case, the patch > > update-patchelf.patch hardcodes PAGESIZE which is not 4k on ppc64el. > > Ah, that's a good hint. > > > This was mentionned here btw : > > https://bugreports.qt.io/browse/PYSIDE-740 > > Indeed, but I did not make the relation between this and the failing build > on ppc64el. > > > I tried compiling pyside2 after dropping update-patchelf.patch and > > pulling > > https://codereview.qt-project.org/gitweb?p=pyside/pyside-setup.git;a=patch;h=0479cbd6abc8fffb9ba8b5f94de067e1670ffffa > > so that the correct PAGESIZE gets defined and it builds fine with the > > system patchelf. > > > > Upstream 5.11.1 has the latter patch, so I guess, upgrading to the > > latest 5.11.1 and removing update-patchelf.patch should be enough to get > > rid of the FTBFS. > > Using the system-wide patchelf brings another problem: > https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=903396 > > Maybe this problem does not appear on ppc64el? Did you try building your > modified source package on amd64?
It actually builds on amd64 and uses the system's patchelf. I didn't see any output related to a stripping issue. dbg .debs were created and are not empty... > Can you prepare an improved update-patchelf.patch that does pass the > correct PAGESIZE? Merge request welcome. Sent : https://salsa.debian.org/qt-kde-team/qt/pyside2/merge_requests/1 The latter may be safer. F. > Cheers, > -- > Raphaël Hertzog ◈ Debian Developer > > Support Debian LTS: https://www.freexian.com/services/debian-lts.html > Learn to master Debian: https://debian-handbook.info/get/
pgpClyQQToosS.pgp
Description: PGP signature
