Aurelien Jarno: > [...] >> >> Hi Aurelien, >> >> If the goal is to make testing free of packages (Pre-)Depending on >> multiarch-support > > Yes, that's exactly the goal, that way we can just stop building the > package in the next upload. There are still a few depending packages > in sid/experimental, but given the bug reports have been sent with > patches attached more than one year ago, I don't mind breaking them. >
Ok, thanks for confirming. >> then removing clsync from testing is also an option >> AFAICT. >> >> I am considering since clsync has had its FTBFS bug against sid for >> almost 2 years now with no reaction from its maintainers. > > That solution has the same result than the binNMU, so that's also fine > for me. I would leave the decision about what is the best way to achieve > that to the release team. > > Thanks, > Aurelien > Could you please file an RC bug against clsync that affects the *testing* version (tags sid + buster if that version is also in stable) about this issue? I am happy to consider removing clsync earlier than the auto-removal would have if time is an issue. Thanks, ~Niels
