Control: tag -1 pending Control: found -1 2:2.0.3-1 On Wed, 01 Aug 2018 at 20:29:50 +0200, Andreas Beckmann wrote: > On 2018-08-01 19:01, Guilhem Moulin wrote: >> On Wed, 01 Aug 2018 at 13:20:37 +0200, Andreas Beckmann wrote: >>> Configuration file '/etc/cryptsetup-initramfs/conf-hook' >>> ==> Deleted (by you or by a script) since installation. >>> ==> Package distributor has shipped an updated version. >>> What would you like to do about it ? Your options are: >>> Y or I : install the package maintainer's version >>> N or O : keep your currently-installed version >>> D : show the differences between the versions >>> Z : start a shell to examine the situation >>> The default action is to keep your current version. >>> *** conf-hook (Y/I/N/O/D/Z) [default=N] ? dpkg: error processing package >>> cryptsetup-initramfs (--configure): >>> end of file on stdin at conffile prompt >>> dpkg: dependency problems prevent configuration of cryptsetup: >>> cryptsetup depends on cryptsetup-initramfs (>= 2:2.0.3-1); however: >>> Package cryptsetup-initramfs is not configured yet. >> >> I wonder if it's a false positive? Following the same upgrade path in a > > No, already asking the question about the conffile that was *not* > modified by the user is a policy violation.
I see, thanks for the pointers. Fixed at https://salsa.debian.org/cryptsetup-team/cryptsetup/commit/b7abb5d06e46f3704c4edeb55d033b6283ae8777 . (Interesting, I seem to recall we threw piuparts at 2:2.0.3-1, but possibly didn't test that same upgrade path.) -- Guilhem.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
