On 07/30/2018 10:28 AM, Ben Hutchings wrote: > You still haven't explained why, having fixed a bug, you then reopened > and reassigned it.
At the time the bug was filed, it wasn't clear to me if the bug is in zutils or in initramfs-tools. I acted quickly to mitigate the problem (as written in https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=903931#35) to imediately minimize its impact whereas the actual source of the problem can be investigated later on. After that it turns out that the bug is not actually in zutils but initramfs-tools. Therefore I reopened the two bugs, merged and reassigned them to initramfs-tools because it needs to be fixed there. > But I don't care to argue with you. >From my point of view there's no argument. I'm asking you constructly and in good faith to elaborate about your rather terse statements that I think are (and turned out to be) not correct (such as "you didn't removed the divertion", "reassigning with no explenation", "you didn't write the control commands properly", etc.) with the intention to get to know where I could improve/learn something for the future. Can we adress the technical thing (bug with patch in initramfs-tools) or is there a non-technical problem? Regards, Daniel