Am 15.07.2018 um 18:14 schrieb Richard Laager: > On 07/15/2018 04:22 AM, Michael Biebl wrote: >> Fwiw, I think it would be better if ntpsec and ntp would not use the >> same service file name and if ntpsec would use ntpsec.service instead. > > Are you willing to explain your reasoning? Specifically, is it because > of these issues, or would you take the same position even if everything > worked perfectly already?
This is mostly unrelated to this issue. I just find it confusing to have the service named the same although it's a different piece of software (in this case a fork). Imagine if rsyslog (which was originally a fork of sysklogd) kept the name of the init script as /etc/init.d/sysklogd. Wouldn't you find that confusing as well? Michael -- Why is it that all of the instruments seeking intelligent life in the universe are pointed away from Earth?
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
