Package: intel-microcode Version: 3.20180703.2 Severity: normal Hi:
Intel reports in page 13 of https://www.intel.com/content/dam/www/public/us/en/documents/sa00115-microcode-update-guidance.pdf that Lynnfield CPUs (ID 106E5) should have microcode 0x09 and that they made 0x0A avaliable. Earlier document https://newsroom.intel.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/11/2018/04/microcode-update-guidance.pdf mentions 0x09 in page 11. But latest updates have neither, still stuck at 0x07, which is very old. ---8<--- iucode-tool -l /lib/firmware/intel-ucode/ | grep -i 106e5 005/001: sig 0x000106e5, pf_mask 0x13, 2013-08-20, rev 0x0007, size 7168 --->8--- Does Debian need to source additional microcode packages? Is Intel limiting the distribution of fixes? Are both documents wrong? Thanks for any help you can provide, GSR -- System Information: Debian Release: buster/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 4.14.0-3-amd64 (SMP w/8 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=en_GB.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8), LANGUAGE=en_GB:en (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Init: sysvinit (via /sbin/init) Versions of packages intel-microcode depends on: ii iucode-tool 2.3.1-1 Versions of packages intel-microcode recommends: ii initramfs-tools 0.130 intel-microcode suggests no packages. -- no debconf information
