Hi Dimitri,

Sorry for the delay replying, sometimes I forget to send emails in my
draft folder when returning to some place with internet access.

On Tue, May 29, 2018 at 10:00:12AM +0100, Dimitri John Ledkov wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> On 29 May 2018 at 01:47, Nicholas D Steeves <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Package: btrfs-progs
> > Version: 4.16.1-1
> > Severity: normal
> > Control: tags -1 patch
> >
> > Hi Dimitri,
> >
> > Trivial patch attached.  The rational is debhelper/11.2.1~bpo9+1 does not 
> > fulfill >= 11, so 11 should be 11~.
> >
> 
> NAK
> 
> 4.16.1 should not be backported as a no-change rebuild. The runtime
> libraries and headers moved, thus breaking existing software in stable
> releases.

Does anything besides snapper use these?  I plan to add breaks
package-version~ for these.

> Also, the transitional package was removed, breaking package declared
> dependencies in earlier releases.

Affected in stretch: xen-tools, schroot, lxc, linaro-image-tools, kvpm, 
fsarchiver

and

libguestfs0: depends on both btrfs-progs and btrfs-tools (yes, really!)

Ok, I agree, a no-change backport is not appropriate, and I'll need to
add the transitional package back in. On a closely-related topic,
would you please consider maintaining the package in git?

Sincerely,
Nicholas

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to