On Fri, 01 Jun 2018 10:20:34 +0200 Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > Excerpts from Francesco Poli (wintermute)'s message of januar 26, 2018 12:28 > am: > > Well, I found out that adding support for this feature is really easy: > > one just needs to modify the templates used for LaTeX and HTML5 > > outputs. > > > > I prepared a patch for these two templates, supporting two new YAML > > fields named "front-notice" and "back-notice". > > > > Since I think this feature may be useful for other users, I would like > > to see my patch applied to the official default templates. > > Thanks for the proposed patch (and the nice words!).
Thanks for following up on my bug report... > > I agree it is a small patch, but disagree to diverge from upstream for > this: Please propose upstream to adopt the change (or simply lean back > and wait: Upstream follows these bugreports so may decide to cherry-pick > on his own). Well, as I said in my original bug report: please apply my patch to the Debian package and forward my wishlist bug report upstream. If you don't want the Debian package to diverge from the upstream behavior, please, at least, forward my wishlist bug report (with my patch) upstream! This could speed up the upstream patch adoption process, I guess... > > Until (if ever) upstream decides to adopt the patch, please use the > Pandoc feature to feed it custom templates. This is indeed what I am doing, but it is a bit inconvenient, since my modifications will have to be re-adapted each time the default templates change (if ever). That's why I thought that such a harmless modification should be integrated into the Debian package and even more importantly into the upstream project. > > > Thanks again, Thanks to you! -- http://www.inventati.org/frx/ There's not a second to spare! To the laboratory! ..................................................... Francesco Poli . GnuPG key fpr == CA01 1147 9CD2 EFDF FB82 3925 3E1C 27E1 1F69 BFFE
pgp4p73MfNux0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
