Sean Whitton writes ("Re: Bug#891216: Requre d-devel consultation for epoch bump [and 2 more messages]"): > On Fri, May 25 2018, Ian Jackson wrote: > > When we get to tidying this up, the epoch-ignoring new file name > > uniqueness section could probably do with a cross-reference. > > Do you mean 3.2.2?
I think I do. "Uniqueness of version numbers". > I'm mildly distressed that we have two patches that I am hoping to get > into the next release of Policy that add subsubsubsections (i.e. the > section number contains three periods) but I think it's the right thing > to do in both cases. I did various git-grep to find out what rst syntax I should use for my subsubsection and discovered that there were quite a few already, all using ^^^^^. I don't think there is anything wrong with subsubsections. They ease all of reading, navigation, cross-referencing, and referencing from elsewhere. Regards, Ian. -- Ian Jackson <ijack...@chiark.greenend.org.uk> These opinions are my own. If I emailed you from an address @fyvzl.net or @evade.org.uk, that is a private address which bypasses my fierce spamfilter.