Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > As I said earlier in this bug: > > <-- snip --> > > Now that teTeX 3.0 is in testing and these testing-specific issues are > no longer an issue, would you expect any problems with simply renaming > libkpathsea4-dev to libkpathsea-dev (and providing libkpathsea4-dev)? > > <-- snip --> > > This should be the easiest way.
If you provide a patch and promise to take care of the problems we don't expect, should they nevertheless occur, I won't object applying it. But I really can't understand why you keep discussing in *this* bug, instead of preparing a patch for, e.g., #354508 you submitted, or any other of the packages still using libkpathsea3. Regards, Frank -- Frank Küster Single Molecule Spectroscopy, Protein Folding @ Inst. f. Biochemie, Univ. Zürich Debian Developer (teTeX)
