Package: dnsmasq
Followup-For: Bug #201437

I know nothing about dnrd so my comment might be totally off the mark.

I guess making dnsmasq provid dnrd would only make sense if there are 
packages depending on dnrd.  But even then the better solution IMHO 
would be for the other packages to depend on dnsmasq or another DNS 
server rather than making dnsmasq provide dnrd which AFAICT it does not 
really do.  

If my analysis is indeed correct it might make sense to close this bug 
which is almost two years old.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to