On Tue, 2018-04-03 at 21:33 +0200, Andreas Beckmann wrote: > On 2018-03-30 16:20, Luca Boccassi wrote: > > Andreas, what should we do here for Stretch? If we update stretch > > to > > 384.130 we'll need the new glx-alternative too as they updated the > > SONAMEs (a bit strange for an LTS branch), but as-is it will be > > borken, > > unless I'm missing something. > > I prepared a stretch update for glx-alternatives in branch stretch. > > > Andreas
Shouldn't this be reverted too: https://salsa.debian.org/nvidia-team/glx-alternatives/commit/30014d629d71ae2400a0aae8533089daec23d8c9 Or another solution found? As it is right now, it won't work in stretch as mentioned in my previous mail -- Kind regards, Luca Boccassi
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
