On Sat, 24 Mar 2018 at 07:09:23 +0800, Matthias Klose wrote: > On 24.03.2018 03:35, Simon McVittie wrote: > > I assume there is a reason (size on disk? dependencies? update > > frequency?) why most of distutils shouldn't be in -stdlib, but in the > > absence of a reference in the changelog, I can only guess at why that is. > > distutils is a build tool, and we should not need it in a runtime environment. > It looks like .version is used too much in a runtime context, but that should > be > the only subpackage used in a runtime context. sysconfig should be preferred > over distutils.sysconfig in python3.
Thanks. So is the motivation behind this change that you want to make libpython3.x-stdlib have a smaller size on disk / in the archive? smcv