Hi Rene! (seems that something in my mail setup ate my first answer on this, so once again...)
On Di, 06 Feb 2018, Rene Engelhard wrote: > set default_searchmeth(1,grepcmds) {hunspell ispell aspell} > set default_searchmeth(1,grepopts) "-B -d british -a" > set default_searchmeth(2,grepcmds) {hunspell ispell aspell} > set default_searchmeth(2,grepopts) "-B -d ngerman -a" > > AFAICS from that hunspell is called when it exists. But > unfortunately for hunspell, the dictionaries are not named "british" > or "ngerman". You are right. So my first idea is to replace british by en_US (should be more common than en_GB) and replace ngerman by de_DE. So hunspell and aspell work as expected. Additionally I could change the order of the spell checkers to prefer aspell over ispell. After this change only ispell is broken... I thought about adding de_DE symlinks to the ngerman package (and request them for at least the british or american dictionary), but this doesn't fully fit the current naming conventions of ispell dictionaries (according to dictionaries-common policy). What do you think about this, Rene? Another option is to use enchant, either as an replacement for all three spell checkers or only as an replacement for ispell, since it should do the mapping between ngerman and de_DE and the like internally (not fully sure, whether this isn't a bug in current 1.6 Debian package, since it uses "deutsch" instead of "ngerman", while enchant 2.1 seems to remove ispell completely). On the other side ispell isn't worth to think too much about, since hunspell and aspell should do a better job in the meantime... Tschoeeee Roland