tags 889592 + pending thanks Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
> Seems a shame to lose a bunch of good catches if we can prune down the > false-positives. And even if this ends up missing some true positives, > it would be a net win to catch the packages that *do* fail to check > DEB_BUILD_PROFILES. Okay, let's give it another go :) Here we go: https://anonscm.debian.org/git/lintian/lintian.git/commit/?id=44b7f754de9c8380c08ca7ffe9c2902ea47ad99b Mattia wrote: > https://tracker.debian.org/media/packages/a/avro-c/rules-1.8.2-1 > Not sure why this is matched, I thought it wouldn't have been: > |override_dh_auto_test: > | dh_auto_test --no-parallel Ah, his is was a bug in my code that was due to scalar/array context ie. using $rules_per_target{'override_dh_auto_test'} instead of, obviously, @{$rules_per_target{'override_dh_auto_test'}} … ;) Enjoy :) Regards, -- ,''`. : :' : Chris Lamb `. `'` la...@debian.org / chris-lamb.co.uk `-
