It's no longer of interest to me, so feel free to close it. Thanks for checking in.
On Jan 31, 2018 11:42, "Niels Thykier" <ni...@thykier.net> wrote: > On Sun, 31 Dec 2017 22:53:00 +0000 Niels Thykier <ni...@thykier.net> > wrote: > > Control: tags -1 moreinfo > > > > On Fri, 16 Jan 2004 15:26:55 -0500 Joey Hess <jo...@debian.org> wrote: > > > Matt Zimmerman wrote: > > > > Yes, it does...seems like exactly the same reasons that an editor > makes > > > > backup files, and dh_clean deletes those. But, if you don't like it, > > > > whatever... > > > > > > I'm not unchangably opposed to it; I just don't know what's right. > > > > > > -- > > > see shy jo > > > > Hi Matt, > > > > It seems that 14 years have past on this bug without any reaction from > > neither you nor Joey. > > > > I am pinging you to hear about your opinion on this bug. If you still > > think it is relevant and you think it is the proper thing to do, then I > > am happy to apply the patch. > > > > Disclaimer: I have zero-knowledge of this part of CVS, so I would be > > trusting your judgement here. > > > > Alternatively, if you are no longer interested in this (e.g. because you > > no longer use CVS), then I think I will take the liberty of closing the > > bug as "wont do". > > > > Thanks, > > ~Niels > > > > > > > > Hi Matt, > > A friendly ping on this. > > If I have not heard from you (or anyone else with interest in this bug) > by 2018-02-19, then I will consider this bug obsolete and close it > without changing the behaviour of dh_clean. > > Thanks, > ~Niels >
