On Fri, 19 Jan 2018 21:58:11 +0800 =?utf-8?B?56mN5Li55bC8?= Dan Jacobson <jida...@jidanni.org> wrote: > I'm just saying > > nftables.service is a disabled or a static unit not running, not starting > > it. > perhaps could be better written > > nftables.service is disabled. Not starting it. > or > > nftables.service is not enabled, so not starting it. > or > > nftables.service is not enabled, so not starting it. > > If currently running, it was started by other means. > >
That message is produced by systemd, not by nftables. Nothing that could be fixed from the src:nftables point of view.
