On 17/11/17 13:25, James Cowgill wrote: > Hi, > > On 15/11/17 17:30, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: >> Source: rustc >> Version: 1.21.0+dfsg1-3 >> Severity: important >> >> Hi, >> >> Sometime ago I asked about rustc bootstrap status on mips*: >> >> 17:08 < infinity0> mips* fail many tests last time i tried, ~3 months ago, i >> didn't want to ship it, i haven't had time to check since >> >> >From >> >https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=rustc&arch=mips&ver=1.14.0%2Bdfsg1-3&stamp=1484077706&raw=0 >> >> test net::tcp::tests::timeouts ... FAILED >> test net::udp::tests::timeouts ... FAILED >> test sys::imp::ext::net::test::timeouts ... FAILED >> >> Looks like timeouts are broken on rust/mips? >> >> mips64el has different errors: >> >> test f32::f32::tanh_0 ... FAILED >> test f64::f64::tanh_0 ... FAILED >> test io::error::Error::from_raw_os_error_0 ... FAILED >> >> Maybe the mips porters can take a look? (debian-mips@ on Cc). Note those >> errors are for 1.14.0, you'll want to try with a newer version first and >> see what's the current status. > > I just tried building the latest rustc on mips64el. As I expected, I hit > this LLVM bug again where any code using atomics will hang: > > https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=32020 > > I'll see if I can get Simon to have a look at it again.
FTR: According to our conversation over IRC, there's a patch for the above bug, but mips64el is now affected by https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/47290 mips(el) may be fine now with that patch, or they may not :P Cheers, Emilio
