Hello, On Wed, 10 Jan 2018 13:54:02 +0100 Geert Stappers <[email protected]> wrote: > Control: retitle -1 two packages of https://github.com/jessevdk/go-flags > > On Wed, Jan 10, 2018 at 01:47:06PM +0100, Geert Stappers wrote: > > On Wed, Jan 10, 2018 at 07:47:20AM +1300, Michael Hudson-Doyle wrote: > > > On 10/01/2018 7:08 AM, "Hector Oron" <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > Package: wnpp > > > > > > > > * Package name : go-flags > > > > Upstream Author : Jesse van den Kieboom > > > > * URL : https://github.com/jessevdk/go-flags > > > > * License : BSD-3-clause > > > > Programming Lang: Go > > > > Description : go command line option parser > > > > > > > > go-flags: Go library for parsing command line arguments > > > > > > > This is already packaged, as golang-go-flags-dev or something like that. > > > > https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/golang-go-flags > > > > and there is also > > > > https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/golang-github-svent-go-flags > > > > both originate from https://github.com/jessevdk/go-flags > > > > both packages are maintaint by [email protected] > > > > > > Closing this ITP could be an option. > > Using this bugreport for discussion what to do with > the "duplicate" is another option.
FWIW, for now I'll use a build dependency on `golang-go-flags-dev`.
However, according to Go packaging policy, I understand the proper
package should be named `golang-github-jessevdk-go-flags`.
What do you think? Should we rename them all to
`golang-github-jessevdk-go-flags` and keep only one copy in the archive?
Best regards,
--
Héctor Orón Martínez
Collabora Ltd
The Platinum Building
St John's Innovation Park, Cambridge
CB4 0DS, United Kingdom
Telephone: +44 (0)1223 362967
Fax: +44 (0) 1223 351966
------------------------------------
Visit Collabora on the Web at https://www.collabora.com/
Follow Collabora on Twitter https://twitter.com/collabora
------------------------------------
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
