It would be interesting to have 8.x in experimental to see if the build still fails. Who knows? We may be lucky :-).
@Jérémy: could you consider uploading this? On 2017-12-13 14:55+0100, Félix Sipma wrote: > On 2017-12-02 13:21+0100, Sébastien Villemot wrote: >> On Sat, Dec 02, 2017 at 01:08:55PM +0100, Félix Sipma wrote: >>> On 2017-11-05 21:27+0100, Jérémy Lal wrote: >>>> 2017-11-05 21:19 GMT+01:00 Félix Sipma <felix+deb...@gueux.org>: >> >>>>> node version 8.9.0 LTS is available upstream. Could you consider packaging >>>>> it? >> >>>> Sure, but nodejs 6.11.x first has to go in testing... >>> >>> Is there still something preventing 6.12.x from migrating to testing? >> >> Yes, it fails to build on mips and mipsel: >> >> https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=nodejs > > OK, thanks. More specifically, this test is failing: > > not ok 1219 parallel/test-zlib > --- > duration_ms: 154.551 > severity: fail > stack: |- > buffer.js:11 > super(arg1, arg2, arg3); > ^ > > RangeError: Array buffer allocation failed > at Buffer.Uint8Array (native) > at FastBuffer (buffer.js:11:5) > at createUnsafeBuffer (buffer.js:38:12) > at allocate (buffer.js:181:12) > at Function.Buffer.allocUnsafe (buffer.js:141:10) > at Function.Buffer.concat (buffer.js:309:23) > at > InflateRaw.stream.Stream.stream.Stream.node.pipe.pipe.on.on.common.mustCall > (/<<PKGBUILDDIR>>/test/parallel/test-zlib.js:153:29) > at InflateRaw.<anonymous> > (/<<PKGBUILDDIR>>/test/common/index.js:445:15) > at emitNone (events.js:91:20) > at InflateRaw.emit (events.js:185:7) > ... > > Could it be that the hosts ran out of RAM?
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
