Hi Paul, On Wed, 2017-12-06 at 22:13 +0100, Paul Gevers wrote: > Hi Abou, > > On 06-12-17 10:26, Abou Al Montacir wrote: > > So for example > > /usr/lib/i386-linux-gnu/fpc/3.0.4/units/fpmkunit > > It is now quite easy to do this after my recent changes. > > > > Is that OK or do we need to do it other way, maybe in a simpler manner? > > For whatever it is worth, that sounds correct to me. This is now done, we now have unit packages co-installable. However, There is still an issue with fp-compiler package. It contains some executables that are installed in /usr/bin while is is MA same according to this report.
As far as I can see fpc-3.0.4, fpcmkcfg-3.0.4, and fpcres-3.0.4 are tools and should be moved to fp-utils. In this case I'd make fp-compiler recommend fp- utils. Then there is grab_vcsa-3.0.4 which is a tool that is specific to video unit, and that shall be installed by fp-units-base, but this is not my preference as this just moves the problem to that package. I would rather move grab_vcsa-3.0.4 to fp-utils, and make the fp-units-base recommend fp-utils (maybe not needed as it recommends fp-compiler). What do you think about this proposal? -- Cheers, Abou Al Montacir
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
