Santiago, Would it be acceptable for me to do a NMU for this?
Also, is there a packaging repository for base-files? I couldn't find any, but that's not an issue for uploading an updated version. Best, nicoo On Sat, Nov 25, 2017 at 01:27:32AM +0100, Nicolas Braud-Santoni wrote: > Package: base-files > Version: 10 > Severity: wishlist > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA512 > > Dear maintainers, > > A number of packages are licensed under the Creative Commons Zero license, > version 1.0, some of which refer to it by its URL at creativecommons.org > (which > is a violation of Debian policy, for which I will open bugs on the individual > packages) > > Could we ship the license in /usr/share/common-licences? > This would be fairly helpful in getting those packages fixed, > and keeping readable/concise debian/copyright files. > > > Best, > > nicoo > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > > iQJNBAEBCgA3FiEEiWEbFKE2h/s1SpJPnU+IAQz+GeMFAloYuPEZHG5pY29sYXNA > YnJhdWQtc2FudG9uaS5ldQAKCRCdT4gBDP4Z49auEADXQ6z4ioNs/zTMbiSAo3+j > JDlZAtXTXaY5jDwOZZrSDSpUEOnkL1ddcOuSFm4fGJQpyVMUOeOPc9msx7mX/04R > MpQQYEGCG+vFUc7PKaeaOgwCe5Q1RgQuS7Scn6fT313P0U90qvAwq0QhmBFJNlSn > KPhwUXEl1D8LpqZUsbFp0cgvndcrJDtn4QNO7o4ciEWloJLOP6ixtHuP37xyZPfp > fBf7yaV+CQhskyqwyh4UNrSbupx/UZRVZGmOs+02wKOOk4dxtBNTR9rKCq2Ci9B5 > Ngv6cCoI+H7tIuMROFqCVHK7LnxpwCuP5JBIUTih/m2zojDnzMYJ4PaY0Eooz/ZT > S6o63ruAMUrT3SvkqriOdo9F/6O2O6YsGdJPp+50VIwb26ysfKU87FlYwQHILEkA > bawTUCtelzg3eNsxI6rY12BdaP8Hn1jW9DCaFs5OolV3W9DGcaAUMYL/hm3k/eYt > h7V4+rHWzYciSAKSS5P5DXSufzkRCl7XspEYVvg2lxKCJ8DjqXMZs4ZNOU5lCVtA > fZ1YQSkk+GsjkbRZuBiJf9YEPL98eDdHjIEiUJSZ+Hi4+IDB/Xs22IvWfrsibxne > ZttBu5Rtq3jXP9CmRaaprgSupDnEsmYZBuBHBZV2nmJIcUF9YcWqSIG4wWA4+Isk > 3vPIgKMDyujjr+R7LhaaIg== > =cGXK > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- >
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
