> Okay, my answer to that will be:
>
> that will introduce a plethora of problems including
>
> 1. sort order depends on user's locale
>
> 2. backup file names (~,.bak,$$$) need to be handled
>
> 3. version control file names (,v .git {arch}) need to be handledUh, then why is it so easy for simple-patchsys? > which will not work with the current model of dpatch, and will > break some part of original functionality of dpatch. Don't see it breaking anything. Inasmuch as that file was not previously optional, there should be no cases where it didn't exist and anything sane happened. > See cdbs 'simple-patchsys', is that what you have in mind? Exactly. I just see a lot of developer's who dislike dpatch, and I think it would only take a few minor changes (this and bug #330808) to make dpatch much more user friendly for the minimilists of us out there. cheers, Charles -- Tho stiff The beard That Nature gave It shaves like down With Burma-Shave http://burma-shave.org/jingles/1930/tho_stiff
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
