Control: forwarded -1 https://github.com/ClusterLabs/libqb/pull/269
"Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo" <[email protected]> writes: > If upstream Hurd people were so sure about it I'd strongly consider to > follow their advice. That's the plan. Unfortunately, the POSIX interface defers the check to runtime on amd64 for example, so we'll have to code that up. > From what you talk about in this bug report, if the extra check is > mostly to satisfy a bug in Hurd and they fix it, you could as well > remove it. When we have the runtime check, the configure check will degrade to a mere optimization specific to exotic platforms guaranteeing a monotonic clock. Probably not worth keeping. > But on the other hand, as Helmut says, if many other projects do it and > since Hurd is not very popular, perhaps it's a wider problem than Hurd. Yes, in the above sense it is, see also the discussion in the linked upstream pull request. -- Regards, Feri
