On Fri, Oct 27, 2017 at 05:16:36PM +0200, Axel Beckert wrote: > (Yes, I'm aware that devscripts just bumped sensible-utils from > Recommends to Depends, probably because of this IMHO too strict check by > lintian.)
Yes, this tag is what made me bump it from recommends to depends in
devscripts, but I consider sensible-utils important nonetheless (I even
use them in some personal scripts).
For devscripts, it was used in nmudiff, which I consider important.
Also (haven't checked) but nmudiff doesn't do any prior check on the
availability of sensible-editor before calling it, and the failure
message would be quite unhelpful.
It might be just me that I'm an happy user of sensible-utils and would
rather see it a more widespread usage :)
--
regards,
Mattia Rizzolo
GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18 4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540 .''`.
more about me: https://mapreri.org : :' :
Launchpad user: https://launchpad.net/~mapreri `. `'`
Debian QA page: https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=mattia `-
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
