Dirk, I don't have the details but this looks like as incorrect Java configuration in R - the Java home is obviously incomplete as it's missing bin/java and/or that path is wrong. Also I'm surprised to the the odd paths "/usr/lib/jvm/default-java/" since at least in my installations I see the actual JVM being used - but then I don't know how your package (or Debian?) abstracts the Java version mess.
Cheers, Simon > On Oct 17, 2017, at 10:24 PM, Dirk Eddelbuettel <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Simon, > > With your new rJava_0.9-9 I tried this against Debian's openjdk-9-jdk -- but > with R 3.4.2 as built against openjdk-7 -- and it still fails: > > checking whether setjmp.h is POSIX.1 compatible... yes > checking whether sigsetjmp is declared... yes > checking whether siglongjmp is declared... yes > checking Java support in R... present: > interpreter : '/usr/lib/jvm/default-java/jre/bin/java' > archiver : '/usr/lib/jvm/default-java/bin/jar' > compiler : '/usr/lib/jvm/default-java/bin/javac' > header prep.: '/usr/lib/jvm/default-java/bin/javah' > cpp flags : '-I/usr/lib/jvm/default-java/include > -I/usr/lib/jvm/default-java/include/linux' > java libs : '-L/usr/lib/jvm/default-java/jre/lib/amd64/server -ljvm' > checking whether Java run-time works... ./configure: line 3736: > /usr/lib/jvm/default-java/jre/bin/java: No such file or directory > no > configure: error: Java interpreter '/usr/lib/jvm/default-java/jre/bin/java' > does not work > ERROR: configuration failed for package 'rJava' > * removing > '/build/rjava-0.9-9/debian/r-cran-rjava/usr/lib/R/site-library/rJava' > /usr/share/R/debian/r-cran.mk:101: recipe for target 'R_any_arch' failed > make: *** [R_any_arch] Error 1 > dpkg-buildpackage: error: fakeroot debian/rules binary gave error exit status > 2 > > > Any ideas? I saw that r-devel got some changes related to javareconf. Do we > need to port that to r-patched? Can you advise? > > Many thanks, Dirk > > -- > http://dirk.eddelbuettel.com | @eddelbuettel | [email protected] >
