On Feb 15, Jon Nelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > This is still a problem in .084-3 from testing using a 2.6.15-1-686 and a > 2.6.12-1-686 kernel. Attached are files containing relevant command > output. Yes. As unbelievable as this may appear, support for persistent network interface names will not magically happen but will have to be implemented. Look at #350183 if you care about the details.
-- ciao, Marco
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
