also sprach Jonas Smedegaard <[email protected]> [2017-08-20 21:20 +0200]: > Reason the package provides the virtual x-session-manager package > is that it does satisfy the needs of recommendations by login > managers and xinit. > > If you have suggestions for handling the situation better, or am > aware of problems with the current approach, please share them. > Otherwise would you mind me closing this as a non-bug?
Sure, you can close this if it's a non-bug. From what you write, it doesn't make sense to make Sugar the x-session-manager/x-window-manager on a system by default, except for the fewest cases. At the moment, lightdm does not give me options over what session to choose, and I need to figure that out, but as long as I can configure the default session of individual users to be Sugar, then that's just fine. -- .''`. martin f. krafft <[email protected]> @martinkrafft : :' : proud Debian developer `. `'` http://people.debian.org/~madduck `- Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing systems "prisons are built with stones of law, brothels with bricks of religion." -- william blake
digital_signature_gpg.asc
Description: Digital GPG signature (see http://martin-krafft.net/gpg/sig-policy/999bbcc4/current)
