Hello, did you try asking on debian-de...@lists.debian.org? This package seems orphaned, but usually its up to the maintainer to declare this.
I am going to need a newer openocd build sometime and would like to know whether this is going to be maintained. Kind regards, Norbert On Tue, 21 Feb 2017 21:53:13 +0100 Geert Stappers <stapp...@debian.org> wrote: > > The e-mail that I wrote yesterday went to the wrong bugreport. > > This time it should go the intented bugreport. > And it has a better "From: " address > > > ----- Forwarded message from Geert Stappers ----- > > Date: Mon, 20 Feb 2017 17:59:07 +0100 > From: Geert Stappers > To: 853...@bugs.debian.org, lu...@debian.org, u...@debian.org > Subject: Re: build depends, maintainer interest for package OpenOCD > User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) > > On Sat, Jan 28, 2017 at 10:24:57PM +0100, Geert Stappers wrote: > > Package: openocd > > Tags: patch > > > > --- a/debian/control > > +++ b/debian/control > <thepatch/> > > That removes 'autotools-dev', there is still 'autotools-dev, autoconf,'. > > And 'libftdi-dev' is now on separate line. > > > > > > Also is this bugreport to show my interrest in co-maintaining > > the Debian OpenOCD package. > > > > Yes, I still want to work on packaging openocd. > > But how think the current maintainers about that? > > That is why Uwe and Luca are also in the To: field. > > > Groeten > Geert Stappers > DD, Maintainer of package urjtag > -- > Leven en laten leven > > > > ----- End forwarded message ----- > > Groeten > Geert Stappers > -- > Leven en laten leven > >
