On Mon, 24 Jul 2017, intrigeri wrote: > Peter Palfrader: > > The more likely way forward is to disable apparmor support since it > > breaks a number of use-cases. > > :/ > > I've tried as hard as I could to avoid this, and to resolve breakage > in a timely manner when it was identified. FTR I'm happy to keep doing > that for the foreseeable future: I'll do this work for Tails anyway, > and I'd rather do it directly in Debian than maintaining a delta. Now, > the outcome of this work is not good enough and you prefer to drop > AppArmor support, well, so be it, that's obviously your call.
I'm considering it at least. We'll see. (I think there's at least one issue that came up recently that isn't in the BTS yet. I'll file a bug when I get around to it.) -- | .''`. ** Debian ** Peter Palfrader | : :' : The universal https://www.palfrader.org/ | `. `' Operating System | `- https://www.debian.org/